In 2016 Jamaica had the world’s highest violent death rate for females, and the sixth highest in total. Our paradise island ranked overall below Syria, Venezuela, El Salvador, Honduras, Afghanistan, and above Iraq, Libya, Somalia. But we were easily number one for slaughtering women, and remain so.

Figure 16.jpg

Our 1,615 murders last year equals 59 per 100,000. The global average is about 6. So we kill each other 10 times as often as the rest of the world.

Only an insane nation could consider this normal. Only drunks, lunatics or doghearts could argue against the State of Emergency that has cut murders by 70% in the areas applied.

Academics say our stratospheric murder rate costs about 5% annually of the Jamaican GDP of roughly $US 14 billion. That is .05 x $US 14 billion = $US 70 million per year.

Each 10% fall in our murder rate therefore saves $US 7 million or $JA 9 billion per year = $JA 750 million per month.

The two weeks of the SOE in St. Catherine (added to St. James) has seen 50 murders islandwide, equating to 1,300 annually, or 20% less than the 1,615 in 2017.

So the 'crime costs 5% of economy' formula means a 20% murder rate decline saves roughly $JA 1.5 billion per month. 

The SOE is thus more than paying for itself. 'We can't afford the State of emergency for long!' is wicked and irresponsible garbage. We can keep it as long as security forces wish, which is what 89% of Jamaicans desire.

(Here is an article ‘Obama extends post-9/11 state of national emergency for 16th year’. It’s still in place today. The US murder rate is one tenth of Jamaica’s.)

Any legislator who does not support keeping the SOE in place as long as and wherever the security forces request it, places no value on Jamaican lives. 99% of murder victims are poor black Jamaicans - mostly poor young black men. It is asinine to bring sex, class or colour into this life or death equation.

Former Commissioner Owen Ellington postulates that two more States of Emergency in Kingston and Central Clarendon might conceivably produce a 70% decline in murders this year alone, saving hundreds of poor black Jamaican lives. Who could not want this?

There are many factors in Jamaica's horrific violent death rate, including immoral gun distributing and gang protecting politicians, a partially corrupt police force, a fractured family structure, a class apartheid education system, and badly skewed income equality. But there is another major contributor - we simply don’t keep enough violent criminals in prison for long enough. 




per 100,000

per 100,000













Costa Rica









Dom Rep












Puerto Rico



St. Kitts



St. Lucia



St. Vincent












vs JA



Jamaica puts criminals in prison at 39% of the average rate of our geographic and Caricom neighbours, while our homicide rate is 346% higher. 16 countries with higher incarceration and lower murder rates versus one outlier nation with by far the lowest incarceration and highest murder rates. It’s obvious which judiciary and legal system is taking the wrong approach.

Those statistics confirm the anecdotal impression that our "leave sentencing to the judges' discretion" approach has failed.

"Dozens of persons who were convicted for illegal possession of guns and ammunition in St James and three other western parishes last year got off easy, as High Court judges opted for suspended sentences and fines as low as $70,000..."

Who doubts our crime rate would plummet if we imprisoned felons at similar rates as Barbados, Cayman or Costa Rica? And we don’t hear those places bawling ‘We locking up too many people and depriving them of their rights!’. Instead we hear them gloating ‘We are so much safer than Jamaica!’.

They must laugh at our self-destructive stupidity of releasing convicted criminals to roam free and continue creating havoc. We Jamaicans can only weep.

Here are seven laws that would cut our crime and murder rate dramatically. 

1. Mandatory sentences for gun crimes

2. Mandatory sentencing for serious wounding

3. Sentences for gun crimes to run consecutively not concurrently

4. No bail for murder or gun crimes

5. No bail for repeat offenders

6. Automatic 10 year sentence for skipping bail

7. Double the last sentence law for repeat offenders (eg first offence 1 year. 2nd offense 2 years. 3rd offense 4 years. 4th offense 8 years. 5th offense 16 years. 6thoffense 32 years.)

This last would address the chronic re-offender problem - no more 27 and 28 offense criminals.

“[Superintendent] Cameron pointed to the prevalence of repeat offenders, some breaking into houses and business places while out on bail… “The judge will tell you they are entitled to bail, and so not before long after you arrest them, they are going to be given bail and be back on the road… since the start of this year we arrested 37 breakers, 23 of them were given bail…We put away…two men in September, one Marvin Lynch for 28 break ins, one Garnett Dixon, an ex-policeman for 27 break ins.”

Our refusal to lock away hardened criminals - as our regional neighbours do - is clearly penny wise and pound foolish. But putting and keeping more violent criminals in prison will require more than stiffer sentences and bail reform. It will mean more resources for police and courts to detect, catch, convict and house wrong doers.

The huge economic benefits of lower crime, make investing in improved policing, efficient courts and more prison space no-brainers. They would also increase state legitimacy, since its most critical role is the preservation of life, law and order. To quote our PM, ‘from Babylon to Zion’.

If some measures require constitutional change, so what? Laws are made to serve the people, not the people to serve laws. How good can a constitution be anyway that has seen the murder rate go from 4 per 100,00 in 1962 to 59 per 100,000 in 2017, an incredible increase of 1,500%? What suited Busta and Norman times is patently not working in these ‘Run Jamaica from Jail’ Vybz Kartel days. Let's confront our sacred cows and bring up to date what needs to be.

Hypocritical human rights alarmists and criminal protecting lawyers – who unfailingly oppose every move to have less Jamaicans gunned down – will predictably cry 'What about the unintended consequences!'. The obvious retort is 'So the highest violent death rate in the world for women and the 6th highest overall is an acceptable status quo?'. The greatest human right is the right to stay alive.

Mr. PM, ignore the heartless and irresponsible grandstanders who want to coddle vicious gunmen who have slaughtered 15,000 Jamaicans in the last 10 years. Listen to the Jamaican masses who want a decent country for their children. Do the job we elected you for and implement every legal measure possible to keep us safe. We want to sleep with our windows open.

Comments (0)

Post a Comment
* Your Name:
* Your Email:
(not publicly displayed)
Reply Notification:
Approval Notification:
* Security Image:
Security Image Generate new
Copy the numbers and letters from the security image:
* Message: